The typical client
Swiss or EU-active MedTech manufacturers with MDR obligations (EU 2017/745) under Swissmedic supervision. Pharma manufacturers with pharmacovigilance obligations (EMA / Swissmedic). Hospital operators with EPR connection and FADP data flows.
Reproducible model evaluation
A model decision from 2026-04-22 classifying an adverse event can still be recomputed in 2031 with the identical model artifact, the same input and the same policy state. That is not "AI audit trailing" marketing — it is a prerequisite for MDR Art. 83 (post-market surveillance).
Data-flow cards as CI artifacts
Every pipeline ships its data card (data categories, processing purpose, storage location, retention period, legal basis under FADP / GDPR). The card is checked in the PR diff — a PR that changes data flows without updating the card fails.
Air-gapped inference
Clinical models run in dedicated inference clusters on EU hardware. No telemetry to model vendors. No requests to US-incorporated entities.
Audit chain for GxP requirements
Every agentic decision in a GxP-relevant pipeline (pharmacovigilance, clinical trial, regulatory submission) is Ed25519-signed and tamper-evident. Compliant with the ALCOA principle without a separate audit-trail system.
Evidence from practice
A MedTech engagement example will follow — with the customer's approval. In the meantime: architecture sketches submitted to Swissmedic in Q1 2026, feedback loop ongoing.
What we do not do
We are not a clinical validation studio. We do not provide Notified Body relationships. We do not deliver software classification per MDR Annex VIII — that is your regulatory affairs team's job. We deliver the substrate on which those activities can happen reproducibly and tamper-evidently.